Public side-effect-free API · live

Procurement evidence
your agent can use.

Search source-linked provider profiles by accountable layer and compare only valid substitutes. The interface preserves provenance, separates commercial relationships, and requires a human for consequential decisions.

01Provenance retained

Each evidence item returns origin, source, check date, and scoped confidence.

02Invalid comparisons rejected

Providers need a shared accountable layer before they can be treated as substitutes.

03Human-gated

Outputs can orient research; they cannot make legal, investment, procurement, or launch decisions.

HTTP interface · v1.2

Five operations.
One procurement contract.

The public contract covers discovery, individual profile retrieval, deterministic project matching, category-valid comparison, and stateless RFI/RFP drafting. Every operation preserves the distinction between an indexed claim and an independently verified fact.

Read the evidence methodology →
GET/api/v1/providersLive

Search provider evidence profiles by asset, service, accountable layer, or keyword.

q

Keyword across names, descriptions, layers, assets, and services

optional
asset

Exact asset label, such as Private credit

optional
layer

Exact role layer, such as Issuance & lifecycle

optional
GET /api/v1/providers?asset=Debt&layer=Issuance%20%26%20lifecycle
GET/api/v1/providers/{id}Live

Retrieve one normalized provider profile, evidence ledger, review date, and verification boundary.

id

Stable provider identifier returned by discovery or matching

required
GET /api/v1/providers/securitize
GET/api/v1/matchLive

Return hard gates, accountable roles, evidence requests, and unranked research candidates—or explicit reasons why matching is withheld.

asset

Economic asset, such as Private credit

required
jurisdiction

Primary issuer and first investor market

required
investor

First intended holder or investor segment

required
stage

Feasibility, structure, selection, or issue readiness

required
GET /api/v1/match?asset=Debt&jurisdiction=United%20States&investor=Accredited%20%2F%20professional&stage=Selecting%20providers
GET/api/v1/compareLive

Return two or three normalized profiles only when they share at least one accountable layer.

ids

Comma-separated provider IDs; two or three required

required
GET /api/v1/compare?ids=securitize,tokeny
POST/api/v1/rfp-draftLive

Generate a stateless procurement packet with blocking gates, role-specific requirements, evidence requests, normalized pricing fields, and a transparent scorecard. This operation stores nothing and contacts no provider.

body

Project frame, objective, decision owner, timeline, budget range, integrations, and optional comparable provider IDs

required
POST /api/v1/rfp-draft
Content-Type: application/json

{"asset":"Debt","jurisdiction":"United States","investor":"Accredited / professional","stage":"Selecting providers","objective":"Normalize provider evidence and five-year cost before selection.","decision_owner":"CFO sponsor","decision_timeline":"3–6 months","budget_range":"$150,000–$500,000","required_integrations":[],"provider_ids":[]}
Agent contract

Useful constraints are part of the product.

May
  • Discover provider categories
  • Retrieve source-linked evidence
  • Flag missing fields and conflicts
  • Draft questions and RFP structures
Must escalate
  • Legal or regulatory classification
  • Investment or suitability decisions
  • Provider selection and contracting
  • Launch approval or asset custody
Must not
  • Infer licensing from marketing language
  • Treat paid relationships as evidence
  • Compare providers without shared layers
  • Represent output as professional advice
Demand-led expansion

What comes next.

NextRemote MCP tool surface

Expose the stable read contract as model-invokable tools after cross-client conformance testing.

ThenAuthenticated project workspaces

Turn the current opt-in brief records into buyer-owned requirements, shortlists, response records, conflicts, and decision history.

LaterProvider response and A2A channel

Let verified provider agents answer structured questions with provenance and explicit human approval.

Design partner program

Building an agent that needs tokenization evidence?

Request design-partner access